<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs are for Dialogue; Twitter is for Snippets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/</link>
	<description>.....a chance to start the day off right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Do&#8217;s and Don&#8217;ts : Part I &#171; 3Fold</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/comment-page-1/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Do&#8217;s and Don&#8217;ts : Part I &#171; 3Fold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=105#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>[...] Do write in a way that encourages people to dialogue. Ask questions, and even consider bringing up questions that are controversial, or that will illicit plenty of different opinions. PR Breakfast Club has a great post on this topic, found by clicking here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Do write in a way that encourages people to dialogue. Ask questions, and even consider bringing up questions that are controversial, or that will illicit plenty of different opinions. PR Breakfast Club has a great post on this topic, found by clicking here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Ottavio</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Ottavio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=105#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>I work with a genius and therefore have a severe inferiority complex…&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kidding. Great stuff, D!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with a genius and therefore have a severe inferiority complex…</p>
<p>Kidding. Great stuff, D!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Ottavio</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Ottavio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=105#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I work with a genius and therefore have a severe inferiority complex…&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kidding. Great stuff, D!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with a genius and therefore have a severe inferiority complex…</p>
<p>Kidding. Great stuff, D!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherri haymond</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>sherri haymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=105#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Great post, Danielle.  I agree that tweets are sort of like a highlight reel - for the full story, you often need a blog post (or a comment thereto...) to flush it out.  Not to change the subject, but just to exapand the concept&#039;s applicability - I feel the same way about a company website.  As my friend @photobiz said at a recent presentation, a company website is sort of like a snapshot brochure - where the blog that accompanies it really brings out the company&#039;s (or its proprietor&#039;s) personality and point of view.  Oftentimes the message in a tweet gets lost because it&#039;s so short - and if you&#039;re trying to express something complex (and all of us are high-level complex thinkers... ;) ), a flushed out blog post is usually the way to go.  Looking forward to continuing this conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Danielle.  I agree that tweets are sort of like a highlight reel &#8211; for the full story, you often need a blog post (or a comment thereto&#8230;) to flush it out.  Not to change the subject, but just to exapand the concept&#39;s applicability &#8211; I feel the same way about a company website.  As my friend @photobiz said at a recent presentation, a company website is sort of like a snapshot brochure &#8211; where the blog that accompanies it really brings out the company&#39;s (or its proprietor&#39;s) personality and point of view.  Oftentimes the message in a tweet gets lost because it&#39;s so short &#8211; and if you&#39;re trying to express something complex (and all of us are high-level complex thinkers&#8230; <img src='http://prbreakfastclub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), a flushed out blog post is usually the way to go.  Looking forward to continuing this conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=105#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I think you have it down to perfection, Danielle. They aren&#039;t competitors; they are two very different approaches.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where my post was mainly coming from was having the conversations on Twitter (and other platforms) around the post, as opposed to &lt;i&gt;through&lt;/i&gt; the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While this is great, and it&#039;s still opening up the conversation, it&#039;s fracturing it. So, Reader A who just reads the blog misses some salient point from Reader B on Twitter, or Reader C discusses on LinkedIn and neither Reader A or B benefit from that comment and any great points it makes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we could find an aggregator system (similar to DISQUS) that brought in &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; meaningful discussions around a post (and not simply a RT or Digg submission), I think we could really go places in blog commenting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have it down to perfection, Danielle. They aren&#39;t competitors; they are two very different approaches.</p>
<p>Where my post was mainly coming from was having the conversations on Twitter (and other platforms) around the post, as opposed to <i>through</i> the post.</p>
<p>While this is great, and it&#39;s still opening up the conversation, it&#39;s fracturing it. So, Reader A who just reads the blog misses some salient point from Reader B on Twitter, or Reader C discusses on LinkedIn and neither Reader A or B benefit from that comment and any great points it makes.</p>
<p>If we could find an aggregator system (similar to DISQUS) that brought in <b>all</b> meaningful discussions around a post (and not simply a RT or Digg submission), I think we could really go places in blog commenting.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/08/31/blogs-are-for/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=105#comment-41</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of when @stephenfry began twittering way back when (maybe last year?), which is why I got a Twitter account to begin with. He was so used to long-form writing that his tweets inevitably trailed off into ... territory. Now he&#039;s a master twitterer, of course, and lately he&#039;s been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stephenfry.com/2009/08/28/damn-damn-damn-damn-damn/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;microblogging&lt;/a&gt; when his thoughts get too long for a tweet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the first in a long line of times where I will use Stephen Fry as an example of all things awesome. I apologize in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of when @stephenfry began twittering way back when (maybe last year?), which is why I got a Twitter account to begin with. He was so used to long-form writing that his tweets inevitably trailed off into &#8230; territory. Now he&#39;s a master twitterer, of course, and lately he&#39;s been <a href="http://www.stephenfry.com/2009/08/28/damn-damn-damn-damn-damn/" rel="nofollow">microblogging</a> when his thoughts get too long for a tweet. </p>
<p>This is the first in a long line of times where I will use Stephen Fry as an example of all things awesome. I apologize in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

