<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing/Twitter Search is a Giant Cluster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/</link>
	<description>.....a chance to start the day off right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: keithtrivitt</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>keithtrivitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1142#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>TJ - Very good point! And that actually goes right back to my entire point of the need for simplicity with monitoring and search of any social media, particularly Twitter, which has its own well-document problems with noise and clutter of messages. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If social media search and monitoring is ever going to be successful and widely adopted, it has to fit into the framework of how people already interact with search, which is why I believe Google&#039;s search is going to be far more successful and adopted than Bing&#039;s Twitter search: Google has already said it plans to incorporate Twitter and SM search within existing search fields, such as when you see links, photos and videos for what you searched for; rather than creating an entirely separate field for SM search, such as Bing has done. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A little bit of information up front for an SM search that is categorized and broken down in a coherent and clear manner can go a long way to toward making SM search a great tool for everyone. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for chiming in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TJ &#8211; Very good point! And that actually goes right back to my entire point of the need for simplicity with monitoring and search of any social media, particularly Twitter, which has its own well-document problems with noise and clutter of messages. </p>
<p>If social media search and monitoring is ever going to be successful and widely adopted, it has to fit into the framework of how people already interact with search, which is why I believe Google&#39;s search is going to be far more successful and adopted than Bing&#39;s Twitter search: Google has already said it plans to incorporate Twitter and SM search within existing search fields, such as when you see links, photos and videos for what you searched for; rather than creating an entirely separate field for SM search, such as Bing has done. </p>
<p>A little bit of information up front for an SM search that is categorized and broken down in a coherent and clear manner can go a long way to toward making SM search a great tool for everyone. </p>
<p>Thanks for chiming in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Dietderich</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/comment-page-1/#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Dietderich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1142#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>I would like to meet this &quot;uber-marketer/PR pro who has time to sort through literally hundreds of lines of useless text and links to find what they are looking for.&quot; I don&#039;t think that person exists!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to meet this &#8220;uber-marketer/PR pro who has time to sort through literally hundreds of lines of useless text and links to find what they are looking for.&#8221; I don&#39;t think that person exists!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1142#comment-709</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by stina6001: RT @KeithTrivitt: Good morning, all! Up on #prbc today, my take on the cluster that is the Bing/Twitter search http://ow.ly/vUba...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by stina6001: RT @KeithTrivitt: Good morning, all! Up on #prbc today, my take on the cluster that is the Bing/Twitter search <a href="http://ow.ly/vUba.." rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/vUba..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keithtrivitt</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>keithtrivitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1142#comment-699</guid>
		<description>TJ - Very good point! And that actually goes right back to my entire point of the need for simplicity with monitoring and search of any social media, particularly Twitter, which has its own well-document problems with noise and clutter of messages. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If social media search and monitoring is ever going to be successful and widely adopted, it has to fit into the framework of how people already interact with search, which is why I believe Google&#039;s search is going to be far more successful and adopted than Bing&#039;s Twitter search: Google has already said it plans to incorporate Twitter and SM search within existing search fields, such as when you see links, photos and videos for what you searched for; rather than creating an entirely separate field for SM search, such as Bing has done. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A little bit of information up front for an SM search that is categorized and broken down in a coherent and clear manner can go a long way to toward making SM search a great tool for everyone. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for chiming in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TJ &#8211; Very good point! And that actually goes right back to my entire point of the need for simplicity with monitoring and search of any social media, particularly Twitter, which has its own well-document problems with noise and clutter of messages. </p>
<p>If social media search and monitoring is ever going to be successful and widely adopted, it has to fit into the framework of how people already interact with search, which is why I believe Google&#39;s search is going to be far more successful and adopted than Bing&#39;s Twitter search: Google has already said it plans to incorporate Twitter and SM search within existing search fields, such as when you see links, photos and videos for what you searched for; rather than creating an entirely separate field for SM search, such as Bing has done. </p>
<p>A little bit of information up front for an SM search that is categorized and broken down in a coherent and clear manner can go a long way to toward making SM search a great tool for everyone. </p>
<p>Thanks for chiming in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Dietderich</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Dietderich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1142#comment-692</guid>
		<description>I would like to meet this &quot;uber-marketer/PR pro who has time to sort through literally hundreds of lines of useless text and links to find what they are looking for.&quot; I don&#039;t think that person exists!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to meet this &#8220;uber-marketer/PR pro who has time to sort through literally hundreds of lines of useless text and links to find what they are looking for.&#8221; I don&#39;t think that person exists!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Bing/Twitter Search is a Giant Cluster :PRBreakfastClub -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Bing/Twitter Search is a Giant Cluster :PRBreakfastClub -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1142#comment-689</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Keith Trivitt, Sara S. Graham. Sara S. Graham said: How could you NOT want to read a post w/ a title like, &quot;Bing/Twitter Search is a Giant Cluster&quot;? http://bit.ly/4qZ3vy #prbc [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Keith Trivitt, Sara S. Graham. Sara S. Graham said: How could you NOT want to read a post w/ a title like, &quot;Bing/Twitter Search is a Giant Cluster&quot;? <a href="http://bit.ly/4qZ3vy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4qZ3vy</a> #prbc [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seriously? Goog v. Bing search Twitter :PRBreakfastClub</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/10/22/bingtwttr-srch-giant-cluster/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Seriously? Goog v. Bing search Twitter :PRBreakfastClub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1142#comment-686</guid>
		<description>[...] h&#8217;d only tinkered with the Bing Twitter search when I saw a preview of Keith&#8217;s post and really got into it. I realized the service was, indeed, as he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] h&#8217;d only tinkered with the Bing Twitter search when I saw a preview of Keith&#8217;s post and really got into it. I realized the service was, indeed, as he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
