<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why PR Should Run Your Company’s Social Media Efforts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/</link>
	<description>.....a chance to start the day off right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zmlljury</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>zmlljury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;zmlljury...&lt;/strong&gt;

zmlljury...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>zmlljury&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>zmlljury&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20 People to Follow in 2010</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>20 People to Follow in 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>[...] KeithTrivitt – Keith is one of the many talented bloggers over at the PR Breakfast Club. Over the past six months we’ve interacted on a number of posts on both of our blogs and also collaborated on a crossover post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] KeithTrivitt – Keith is one of the many talented bloggers over at the PR Breakfast Club. Over the past six months we’ve interacted on a number of posts on both of our blogs and also collaborated on a crossover post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest post action</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest post action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>[...] Click Here to read the full piece.   If you enjoyed reading, please consider sharing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click Here to read the full piece.   If you enjoyed reading, please consider sharing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Vincenzini</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Vincenzini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Jeff - nice post. Content is definitely the king, but the other facets you mentioned are also important.&lt;br&gt;I wrote something similar earlier in the week which made a case for all disciplines, but I think PR should take the lead. - Here&#039;s the link: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/grabgrab&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/grabgrab&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; nice post. Content is definitely the king, but the other facets you mentioned are also important.<br />I wrote something similar earlier in the week which made a case for all disciplines, but I think PR should take the lead. &#8211; Here&#39;s the link: <a href="http://bit.ly/grabgrab" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/grabgrab</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffespo</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffespo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>I see your point and would point you to the work that @chimoose is doing with Humana - &lt;a href=&quot;http://crumpleitup.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://crumpleitup.com/&lt;/a&gt;. Regulated areas are going to be tough sells moving forward for SM, but to be honest in my opinion, by the time the lawyers have lifted their heads, SM will have changed and what they have approved will be a little behind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would put on the creativity hat and see what kind of things you could do. For instance can you talk about X program that encourages X folks to ride bikes to work or exercise benefits. Almost become the expert in these fields as &quot;sponsored by co X.&quot; Folks will understand that this is what you can talk about and not complain that their co-pay went up X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point and would point you to the work that @chimoose is doing with Humana &#8211; <a href="http://crumpleitup.com/" rel="nofollow">http://crumpleitup.com/</a>. Regulated areas are going to be tough sells moving forward for SM, but to be honest in my opinion, by the time the lawyers have lifted their heads, SM will have changed and what they have approved will be a little behind.</p>
<p>I would put on the creativity hat and see what kind of things you could do. For instance can you talk about X program that encourages X folks to ride bikes to work or exercise benefits. Almost become the expert in these fields as &#8220;sponsored by co X.&#8221; Folks will understand that this is what you can talk about and not complain that their co-pay went up X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laney</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Laney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>I think I have to approach it differently because I am in pharma, things are regulated so heavily that we have to pay particular attention to every word written and how it could be interpreted. (There are some companies that require seeing our pitches before we send them out.) I am not saying that we should have a canned response for when someone asks a certain question, but when you make Q&amp;A documents you are doing the same thing. When your clients are up in front of media at a press conference and questions start firing at them, that&#039;s real time is it not?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a FDA regulated world, there is no way the Legal and Regulatory departments would let me, even understanding the company message and culture, respond without approval first. That&#039;s one of the problems pharma is facing in even just starting the whole SM deal. Unfortunately, until the regulations work itself out - for pharma at least - its going to be scripted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I have to approach it differently because I am in pharma, things are regulated so heavily that we have to pay particular attention to every word written and how it could be interpreted. (There are some companies that require seeing our pitches before we send them out.) I am not saying that we should have a canned response for when someone asks a certain question, but when you make Q&#038;A documents you are doing the same thing. When your clients are up in front of media at a press conference and questions start firing at them, that&#39;s real time is it not?  </p>
<p>In a FDA regulated world, there is no way the Legal and Regulatory departments would let me, even understanding the company message and culture, respond without approval first. That&#39;s one of the problems pharma is facing in even just starting the whole SM deal. Unfortunately, until the regulations work itself out &#8211; for pharma at least &#8211; its going to be scripted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffespo</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffespo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1475</guid>
		<description>Very good point as well Keith and to be honest I am clueless about agencies on the D2D basis. But I was thinking along the line of the role that happened with our former VP of PR who was with the agency that did our PR and was brought in-house when we went public.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was thinking that SM may present the opportunity for many flacks to make that jump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point as well Keith and to be honest I am clueless about agencies on the D2D basis. But I was thinking along the line of the role that happened with our former VP of PR who was with the agency that did our PR and was brought in-house when we went public.</p>
<p>I was thinking that SM may present the opportunity for many flacks to make that jump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffespo</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffespo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Laney, because it isn&#039;t scripted. I was not saying that it should be scripted it was kind of poking at that. Granted I have some stock thank you responses (but how many ways can you say TY?), but everything else is straight from me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was also saying that PR for the most part understands the overall message of the company and shapes it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laney, because it isn&#39;t scripted. I was not saying that it should be scripted it was kind of poking at that. Granted I have some stock thank you responses (but how many ways can you say TY?), but everything else is straight from me.</p>
<p>It was also saying that PR for the most part understands the overall message of the company and shapes it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keithtrivitt</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>keithtrivitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>Jeff - Interesting point re: agency folks getting heavily involved as a means to move more &quot;in-house&quot; with a company and its PR efforts. That&#039;s a really strong point, as I think it would actually help to alleviate a common complain among clients in that agency folks either don&#039;t know enough about the ins-and-outs of a company&#039;s business or industry, or are too detached from things to truly understand a company&#039;s story. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But by getting heavily involved in managing a company&#039;s social media efforts, the agency folks can become more of an insider within the company, which can help to engender trust and respect from many execs who often don&#039;t see the true value of social media for many projects and initiatives down the road. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only downside and difficulty of this, of course, is that agency folks don&#039;t often stay on with a company for more than say a year or two, as companies move through several different PR/social media agencies. That&#039;s why I view much of an agency&#039;s job when it comes to social medias as a counseling, resource and oversight/management function, where we educate and empower internal advocates to really make the magic happen with a company&#039;s social media efforts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But that&#039;s an entirely different post in itself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; Interesting point re: agency folks getting heavily involved as a means to move more &#8220;in-house&#8221; with a company and its PR efforts. That&#39;s a really strong point, as I think it would actually help to alleviate a common complain among clients in that agency folks either don&#39;t know enough about the ins-and-outs of a company&#39;s business or industry, or are too detached from things to truly understand a company&#39;s story. </p>
<p>But by getting heavily involved in managing a company&#39;s social media efforts, the agency folks can become more of an insider within the company, which can help to engender trust and respect from many execs who often don&#39;t see the true value of social media for many projects and initiatives down the road. </p>
<p>The only downside and difficulty of this, of course, is that agency folks don&#39;t often stay on with a company for more than say a year or two, as companies move through several different PR/social media agencies. That&#39;s why I view much of an agency&#39;s job when it comes to social medias as a counseling, resource and oversight/management function, where we educate and empower internal advocates to really make the magic happen with a company&#39;s social media efforts. </p>
<p>But that&#39;s an entirely different post in itself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffespo</title>
		<link>http://prbreakfastclub.com/2009/12/11/why-pr-should-run-sm/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffespo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prbreakfastclub.com/?p=1818#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>We have a search team that covers SEO, Organic and Paid Search who we work closely with</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a search team that covers SEO, Organic and Paid Search who we work closely with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

