Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/0/d104357061/htdocs/prbc/wp-content/plugins/ultimate_ga.php on line 524
In such un-Cog-like fashion, this will be brief. Well, because there’s only so much we all know about The Cog.
I made a comment on Cog’s Gear Grindings a while back regarding the “sheep mentality” in social media, particularly on blogs and Twitter. A little bit of, you can’t possibly love everyone’s blog you comment on, and a little bit of, are we just being nice to each other because life’s tough? Okay, it wasn’t that sour.
And then the whole Matt Whittier thing happened. . . .
And my brain started churning. . . .
Let’s think about what statistically happens in our Social Media world here: someone acts like a jerk, attacks, is downright rude and disrespectful = he gets thrown to the wolves, eviscerated by the witty repartee of the pack.
Let’s now observe Cog. He’s snarky, but lovable (for an old man with warts). And snarks on mostly those none of us know: his boss; co-workers; the twit new hire; and clients.
So allow me to rein all of this in. Do we:
A) Praise Cog’s sometimes scathing commentary because he says what we are all thinking? Our thoughts (and really, our identity as well) are protected here because he’s already said it for us. No work to be done on our part, and there’s no suffering on his end because there are virtually (currently) no repercussions.
B) Join forces and stone him to death were he to have a face, name, identity, place of employment…because socially speaking, that’s the “right thing to do?” We usually shake our finger at the Debbie-Downers and Negative-Nelly’s.
Cog is NO Matt Whittier; I’m making no comparison here (Cog is like a butterfly—according to @rachelakay—compared to Mr. Whittier). But, he is inCOGnito for a reason. He knows his COGmentary would warrant punishment professionally and socially.
When I first dumped these thoughts onto my keyboard, it all sounded a bit convoluted (heck, it made no sense). I’m hoping after 20 some drafts this can get my point across. I really just wanted to open the discussion up originally between me, myself, and I to the blogosphere. This is more of a sociological question of behavior in social media (forgive me, I minored in sociology). So please, please tell me your logical and analytical thoughts on the questions I pose. No rock throwing. Is it A, B, or is there a C, D, or even a Z?
[Editor’s Note: (Cog Writing) I had no hand in the brainstorming or writing of this post. It was submitted as-is by Kate, one of the PRBreakfastClub.com writers, (Ok, TJ may have done some copy editing). Since we’re all about hearing different opinions, we’ve decided to allow it to run, even though it is about one of us (ok, me)]