Can We Automate PR? Not so Fast…


Warning: Use of undefined constant user_level - assumed 'user_level' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/0/d104357061/htdocs/prbc/wp-content/plugins/ultimate_ga.php on line 524

There are a lot of things in life that get better with automation. Alarm clocks. Coffee makers. Calendar reminders of your wedding anniversary. But as PR pros, could we make our written communications and messaging better with automation?

That’s the question apparently attempted to be answered by a slate of new automated news reporting services, including one called StatSheet, according to a recent New York Times article.

It’s an interesting question to ponder. The Times article notes that so far, StatSheet is mainly being used as a sort of fill-in news service for collegiate sports programs that lack the level of media attention and coverage that their big-time brethren get.

As a former collegiate sports information director, this obviously piqued my interest, so I gave StatSheet a closer look. It’s worth a quick glance at one of the service’s customized news sites for every NCAA Division I school . . . if only to see for yourself why the concept of automated news, and possibly automated PR, is doomed.

Perhaps, I thought, the same concept could be applied to the broader PR world? Then again, maybe that’s not such a great idea. Let’s take a look at what automation of certain tried-and-true PR tasks might look like:

Well, we could robocall our pitches to reporters:

“Hello. This is <NAME> calling from <COMPANY NAME> on behalf of <CLIENT> …”

Oh wait, you can already do that. . .

Or, we could set up automated tweets, replies and DMs on Twitter for our clients. Oh right, you can already (unfortunately) do that, too . . .

In all reality (and seriousness), PR is a business, thankfully, that requires a significant amount of good old-fashioned real work, strategy and intellect from real humans. Meaning, automating tasks often causes more issues than it solves, not to mention is just plain creepy.

Much of our value comes from the non-formulaic aspects of our jobs – from counseling executives on the best form of messaging to address a pressing business issue to developing strategy for a client campaign. Like many professions, PR is not one that can easily fit into a tidy box where what you want accomplished can be checked off and spit out by a computer program.

Could automation of some of our services add any value to our work? Possibly, though I wouldn’t bet any part of my career (or yours) on it.

Automation is supposed to enhance our lives and improve the quality of products and services we use. Yet, in the case of Stat Sheet Network and similar auto-communcation services, the hype often falls far short of reality.

And that’s a good thing . . . for all of us human PR practitioners.

<sarcasm>Note to fellow PRBC editors: We really need to invest in a StatSheet-like program to write all of our posts. That would make our lives so much easier!</sarcasm>

PR Autotask 6000 wrote this post for Keith while he was out on a run. So blame the computer program if you didn’t like it.

[reus id=”6″][recent posts]

(CC) Image courtesy TMAB2003

Share on Tumblr